Nope. They actually listened to her.
Yea. They listened to her after they fucked her over by leaking her letter.
(Some of the anyway, Harris and Booker actually asked the most probing and relevant follow-up questions.
Interesting observation. I must have missed the probing questions amidst the two of them preening for the cameras, getting free video for their presidential runs.
Very DISTURBING, because accuracy of FACTS is a critical component of jurisprudence.
I agree. The problem is that there were no established facts; all we had were recollections going 37 years back. She didn't even have a friend who remembered the party. Did you ever go to a party at that age without a BFF? I didn’t.
And, although it’s much more difficult to prove a negative, Kav did better on that score; the friend that she remembered, Mark Judge, agreed with Kav that the incident had never happened.
Ultimately, they were matching her credibility up against Kavanaugh’s.
Screaming, yelling and beating ones chest is not.
If Kavanugh hasn’t screamed, yelled, or beat his chest in the 12 years on the DC circuit, I doubt he’ll start now. A judge does not have to have a passive nature to be a good judge.