We’re not in disagreement. My point is that *if* CO2 is a greenhouse gas, and there is laboratory evidence that it is, *and* as we know factually that manufacturing processes produce it, *then* it makes sense to control it, *when* that can be done organically without impact to economies.

Simply put, if you can figure out how to get the same energy output from a renewable source as a carbon source on a per-dollar basis, there’s no reason not to do it.