We're actually saying the same thing, albeit differently. As I wrote earlier today to the same individual, there will of course be variations in any skeletal metric around whatever the male or female mean is.

For example, the "textbook" angle of articulation for males, IIRC, is 13%; for females, its 18%. Specific males and specific females will have angles of articulation that vary around that mean in a bellshaped curve. with overlap of the tails, to a varying extent, between the two curves. If you use height rather than hip angle of articulation, this graphic illustrates what I'm talking about:

https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-7ca1b9aeab2a1ef304aa5df52b2f9524

Anyway, this sort of overlap is typical of most anatomical or physiologic metrics.

Hope that helps.