Well, the entire excuse he used for not understanding my OP’s restatement was chickenshit :-).

Basically, I restated, he went off on a load of tangential points because he missed the reference to Pascal’s Wager and thought I was basing my arguments on an acceptance of deity, then came back and agreed with half of what I was saying, moved the goalposts on the rest, and then blamed me for the confusion. :-)

I think we’ve both had about enough of that for one day. It’s my fault for messing with him longer than a should have. Same old tired arguments.

Free markets, free minds. Question all narratives. If you think one political party is right and the other party is evil, the problem with our politics is you.

Free markets, free minds. Question all narratives. If you think one political party is right and the other party is evil, the problem with our politics is you.