I love how you’re preemptively claiming victim status.
Well, it’s pretty clear you’re not reading my posts. You’re used to arguing this matter on an evidentiary basis, and therefore you’re completely unable to answer the simple question of “Why wouldn’t you want your election system to be hardened against fraud to the best extent reasonably possible?”, which doesn’t require an evidentiary basis at all. :-)
You need to learn to think outside the box. Get out of your comfort zone a bit.
You clearly don’t care about facts or evidence so why are you wasting your time using false analogies.
Well :-), the “false analogy” to which you refer is at this point unrefuted by you. Saying something is false, or saying it’s a waste of time, doesn’t mean that it is. :-)
The only person you’re trying to convince is yourself.
Oh, I’m convinced. Didn’t even have to try. :-)