There is zero evidence that Ms. Clinton should be prosecuted for anything.
The statement is categorically false, IF you take the Comey report at its word. He calls out violations on her part of a statute which specifically states that the intent of the perpetrator is not a factor when making the decision to prosecute, then declares he has decided not to prosecute based on the intent of the perpetrator.
Ms. Clinton’s only “crime” is having political aspirations and the where-with-all to fulfill them while lacking a penis.
Please provide polling-based polling evidence that shows the extent to which Mrs. Clinton’s lack of a penis was considered a crime by the voters. Otherwise, this is just your opinion stated as if it were a fact.
This is what has infuriated right-wing mysogenists (and racists, and low-testosterone losers) since her days as the wife of an obscure Governor of an unreconstructed, bass-ackwards Southern State. Because these Clay-Eating goons have no control over their own thought processes they were prime suckers for the more strategic thinking criminal cabal known as the Right-Wing spin-o-sphere of elected politicians and regressive media types who played successfully on their fears of being eclipsed both socially and economically by someone with an excess of melatonin, a vagina, or both.
Hm. And all that seems….SANE, to you?