I don’t see how what you’ve written is a response to the portion of my comment that you’ve cited. So I’m going to conclude that you’re actually responding to other things that you didn’t quote or mention or reference.
No need to conclude, just ask me.
My read of your post was that you were mocking the article, implying that conservative women were so hard to find, such an endangered species (gorillas in the mist) that research dollars without end must be spent to study these strange, bizarre creatures.
And to me, that’s a political divisive thought — after all, if conservative women are such a tiny, endangered group, they can easily be ignored….but may as well mock them a bit on the way out, eh?
Hence my comment on the respect of different political views.
If that’s not what you meant, it’s not what you meant. No worries.