I have been arguing that there is a legitimate fact based legal case against Trump.
I get that. I have been arguing you have innuendo and circumstantial evidence.
Your new moving the goalposts argument is that it does not matter because the personality cult of Trump won’t care regardless of the facts and law.
If you think that pointing out political reality is “moving the goalposts” then we’re pretty much done.
My position is pretty clear, and has to do with legality, not personality cults. The law does not permit the indictment of a sitting president, for good reason. ERGO, you must convince the nation that your “fact based legal case” is indeed heinous enough to turn the court of public opinion against him. You believe you can do that? Have at it. But if all you’re doing is undermining a sitting president, you’re causing more damage than he is, in that the fallout of these tactics are poisoning the relationship between the other major nuclear superpower.
That has nothing to do with “Trump nutters”, although I can see how you’re using that to justify the aforementioned mental masturbation.